How to Provide Corrective Feedback with Less Stress and Better Results

Cathie Leimbach • June 28, 2021

Do you dread providing corrective feedback? Maybe you avoid it until a formal performance review.  But then, you can’t understand why your employees seem shocked when you finally do give feedback on their performance. If this sounds familiar, you aren’t alone in being uncomfortable and stressed about providing corrective feedback to enable better performance and skill development.

 

While you may feel uncomfortable giving candid feedback, studies show that it is precisely what most people want. Employees want to know what they can do to improve their performance. Waiting for an annual review risks slowing down their professional development to a snail’s pace.

 

Failing to respond to performance or behavior issues can have a significant impact on your team. When performance standards are not uniformly applied, resentment and tension among team members will occur. Often, we tend to focus corrective feedback on low performers that need the most improvement. It is equally important to provide feedback to your top performers to support professional development, increase their engagement, and increase retention. 

 

Here are some general guidelines for successfully providing corrective feedback:

  • It is given in a one-to-one meeting.
  • It is timely, as close to the actual event or performance problem as possible.
  • Examples given are specific, factual, and detailed.
  • Your delivery is calm and supportive.
  • The feedback session is a two-way conversation that empowers the employee.

 

Following is a guide to break down a corrective feedback conversation into specific steps.

 

Step One: Describe the specific action/behavior in neutral terms. Use a calm, supportive tone of voice.

  • “I notice you have missed two deadlines to provide financial data to the Project XYZ team over the past three weeks.”

 

Step Two: Ask their opinion as to why this is happening. Use open-ended questions, listen for what is happening, how it is happening, why it is happening, and any identified obstacles.

  • “What has caused these deadlines to be missed?”
  • “What do you think the issue is?
  • “What specific obstacles are preventing you from meeting the deadlines agreed to?

 

Step Three: Ask what impact they expect this is having on the flow of work, their team, customers, etc.

  •  “What do you think the result of the missed deadlines is on the rest of the team?”
  • “How are these delays impacting the overall project?”

 

Step Four: Ask what changes they are able and willing to make to correct the situation. This is an essential part of the corrective feedback process and empowers the employee to commit to improving performance.

  • “Now that we have identified the issues, what do you think you can do to correct the situation?”
  • “What changes are you willing and able to make right away that will improve the situation?”

 

Step Five: Ask what you can do to support them in their effort to correct the situation. This is an essential part of the process because often employees are unclear about expectations, their areas of responsibility, or have not received enough training and need additional professional development.

  • “What support can I provide you to help you make the changes you have suggested?”
  • “What additional information or training do you need to be successful in making these changes?”
  • “How can I help you make these changes?”

 

Step Six: Ask them to suggest a time, place, and agenda to monitor their corrective process. Follow-up is crucial. Don’t leave the meeting until the next meeting time is on both of your calendars.

  •  “Let’s set a follow-up time to meet and see how things are progressing. What would be a good day and time for you?”

 

Providing corrective feedback provides the foundation for each employee to perform well, grow professionally, stay engaged, serve your customer or client, and ultimately impacts the bottom line. Approaching it as a problem-solving exercise using the steps above will make it less stressful for you and your employee.

Speaking Up Is Not Defiance. It's Duty.

By Cathie Leimbach • June 23, 2026
Most leaders say they want employees to speak up. They want people who spot risks, question assumptions, and help the organization make better decisions. Yet many employees hesitate to do exactly that. Why? Because leaders often respond to speaking up as if the speaker is complaining, criticizing or resisting. When people fear being viewed as difficult, they stop sharing what they see. The organization loses valuable information, ideas, and perspectives. A recent McKinsey article found that teams with high psychological safety are two to three times more likely to generate breakthrough ideas. When people feel safe speaking up, better thinking follows. The best leaders understand a simple truth: Speaking up is not defiance. It's duty. When employees question assumptions, raise concerns, or offer a different perspective, they are helping the team avoid blind spots and make stronger decisions. That's why effective leaders don't merely tolerate speaking up—they invite it. They ask: What are we not seeing? What assumptions are we making? Who might see this differently? What information are we missing? Just as importantly, they respond with curiosity instead of defensiveness. They thank people for expressing their perspective. They explain how input influenced decisions. They make speaking up safe. Because organizations don't improve when everyone agrees. They improve when people feel responsible for helping the team see what others may have missed. In healthy organizations, speaking up isn't rebellion. It's responsibility. It's duty. Leadership Reflection Think about your last leadership team meeting. Did people simply agree? Or did someone help the team see something it otherwise would have missed? Download 5 Questions That Surface Better Thinking and make speaking up a productive part of how your team thinks, decides, and performs.

Put Your Brain in Gear When Using AI

By Cathie Leimbach • June 16, 2026
Artificial Intelligence is becoming a powerful workplace tool. It can summarize information, analyze data, draft content, and generate ideas in seconds. But there is a growing risk leaders need to recognize: AI can sound convincing even when it is wrong. In an article by Erica Dhawan, she describes a legal case where attorneys used ChatGPT to help prepare a court filing. The brief looked professional, the reasoning seemed logical, and the citations appeared legitimate. There was only one problem: several of the cited cases did not exist. The AI had fabricated them. The danger wasn't carelessness. It was trust. Because the information was presented clearly, confidently, and professionally, nobody stopped to question it. Psychologists call this the "fluency heuristic"—our tendency to assume information is accurate when it is easy to process and sounds credible. As leaders, we cannot allow polished answers to replace critical thinking. When you find yourself thinking, "This is too good to be true," put your brain in gear. Dig deeper. Investigate. Verify the facts. Ask what assumptions were made, what information might be missing, and what evidence supports the conclusion. AI can be an incredible assistant. It should never become a substitute for judgment. The smooth answer is not always the wrong one—but it is often the one that deserves the most scrutiny. Before You Act, Verify. The biggest risk with AI isn't bad information. It's believable information that's wrong. That's why we created the AI Verification Checklist for Leaders —a simple 5-minute tool designed to help leaders challenge assumptions, identify missing information, verify conclusions, and make better decisions before acting on AI-generated recommendations. Download the free AI Verification Checklist for Leaders and start asking better questions before making important decisions.