Is the ROI of Remote and Hybrid Work Options Worth the Effort?

Cathie Leimbach • January 30, 2024

Studies show that many hybrid and remote workers are more engaged with their work and are happier with their life than when they worked at company facilities. Yet, the need to support hybrid and remote workers with intentional strategies for communication, collaboration, and relationship building and the challenges in setting effective policies around work location are contributing to increased stress at work.


52% of employees report experiencing ‘a lot of stress at work yesterday’. Since this leads to poor wellbeing, productivity, and longevity, it is important that we address significant workplace stressors. However, work location is not the most critical stressor.  

Let’s remember that one of the common reasons for employees quitting or choosing to work remotely is to get away from a bad boss. Gallup’s research indicates that ‘how employees are managed has about four times as much influence on employee engagement and wellbeing as their work location’.   


Today, there is a downward trend in employees’ sense of connection with their organization’s mission and purpose. When employees don’t have faith in their leaders, they lose faith in the organization’s potential to offer them a future. Only 23% of U.S. employees strongly agree that they trust the leadership in their workplace. Yet, when leaders communicate clearly, lead and support change, and inspire confidence in the future, 95% of employees report fully trusting their leaders.

It is pretty clear that gaining employees’ trust by leading effectively is a much bigger concern than work location! Yet, few organizations invest in training people leaders in effective people management practices. Why are many sweeping this elephant under the carpet? 

·       Perhaps the hard task of changing one’s leadership approach is too daunting.

·       Maybe the challenge of measuring the benefits of investing in soft skill training doesn’t meet their return-on-investment criteria.

·       It could be that they don’t know what practices are effective, so they don’t know where to start with training.


Although it isn’t well known yet, there is very good news in the leadership development arena. There is a solution to these dilemmas! The developers of a program called Conversational Management digested a lot of credible research on management practices. They studied the intersection of these research findings and developed a very impactful, interactive training program which guides leaders in becoming effective people managers. At least one company has documented a 20-fold return on its training investment.

And they offer an easy try-before-you-buy opportunity! To learn more, participate in the first module of Conversational Management by registering for the next Zoom Test Drive. I look forward to seeing you there!

By Cathie Leimbach April 21, 2026
Most leaders don’t struggle because they don’t care. They struggle because the root causes of disengagement are easy to miss. Right now, many employees are emotionally detached from their workplaces—and a majority are still watching for their next opportunity. But this isn’t about perks or pay. It’s about something more foundational. Less than half of employees clearly know what’s expected of them. Even fewer feel encouraged to grow, connected to purpose, or heard at work. Those aren’t surface issues. They’re leadership gaps. And they show up in everyday conversations. Engagement is built—or broken—through how leaders communicate expectations, opportunities, purpose, and voice. For example: When expectations aren’t clear, people guess and stay busy—and performance suffers. When employees don’t see how their work matters, connection fades. When leaders don’t ask for employees’ perspectives, people disengage—even if they stay. These aren’t big system failures. They’re missed conversations. The good news? What causes detachment is also what fixes it. Where could clearer, more intentional leadership conversations reconnect your team? Look at your last two workplace culture or employee engagement surveys. What do they show about how well your leaders meet employee needs? Where are leaders falling short? How do these strengths and gaps affect your bottom line? How long are you willing to accept the underperformance that follows?  Your Next Step: Click here to book a free conversation with Cathie Leimbach about discovering and/or closing leadership gaps in your organization.
By Cathie Leimbach April 14, 2026
Most workplace issues don’t start big. They build slowly—through missed conversations, unclear expectations, and more people leave. That’s where disengagement shows up. And when it does, the cost is real: 78% higher absenteeism 51% higher turnover 63% more safety incidents These differences come from comparing the 25% of organizations with the strongest employee engagement to those in the bottom 25% (Gallup). And across the U.S., the bigger picture is hard to ignore— disengaged employees cost organizations nearly $2 trillion annually in lost productivity (Gallup). These aren’t just HR problems. They’re leadership problems. When people don’t feel connected, clear, or supported: They call off more More people quit Mistakes and risks increase The good news? These patterns are preventable. Strong leaders reduce these issues by: Addressing problems early Creating clarity instead of assumptions Having consistent, direct conversations Reinforcing expectations before things drift It’s not about doing more. It’s about leading differently—every day. A question to consider: Which of these challenges is quietly costing your organization the most right now? 👉 Join our upcoming Leadership Conversation on April 27th, 3:00 PM—this is not a webinar . This is a candid conversation with leaders comparing their employee engagement challenges and successes.  Most organizations are tolerating more of this than they realize. The question is—are you?