One-on-One Meetings Reduce Employee Quitting

Cathie Leimbach • July 18, 2023

The role of a people manager or supervisor is to achieve organizational goals through the work of other people.  The leaders' success is usually measured by the results achieved by their team. With this in mind, highly successful leaders proactively support each of their team members to be successful. They tend to hold regular one-on-one meetings with each employee, increasing both productivity and retention.


Because team members have differing experiences, responsibilities, strengths, weaknesses, and personalities, the best way to support their unique contributions and needs is to have regular one-on-one meetings.  When employees have quality weekly one-on-ones with their manager, they are more likely to be clear on what is expected of them, share where they are struggling, get answers to their important but not urgent questions, and receive relevant training to enhance their skills.  This increases the individual's and the organization's productivity and morale. 


During one-on-one meetings the manager can learn something about the employee's personal life, give specific praise for areas of employee success, and provide constructive support in areas of uncertainty or underperformance.  This helps the employee feel valued and respected, reducing employee quitting and improving their work quality and quantity.


Ideally, most of the one-on-one meeting is spent on the employee's agenda.  Rapport is built when the first few minutes is used for  personal updates or interests.  Then, the manager can ask, "What would you like to talk about during out time together?" Now, the employee has the floor for whatever is on their mind.  The employee may provide a progress report, clarify expectations, or get help overcoming a stumbling block.  Sometimes, they may share a family challenge that is interfering with their focus at work. Another important question for the manager to ask is, "How can I help you be successful this week?"  This gives an employee permission to ask their leader to remove an obstacle whether it is bureaucracy, information, or time. 


Many organizations find that 30-minute one-on-ones provide the most effective balance of having enough time for meaningful discussion and not taking too much time away from revenue-generating activities.  If that seems far too long for you, even 10-minute employee-focused one-on-ones can yield great results. 


One-on-ones don't waste time.  They are so effective at increasing morale and productivity that they may generate the highest rate of return on your payroll dollars.  


When could you start having weekly one-on-ones with each of your employees to reduce turnover and improve productivity?  Register for - and attend - our free 45-minute webinar “3 Tips to Reduce Employee Quitting”.   

By Cathie Leimbach November 10, 2025
In most organizations, the instinct is to add —more goals, more projects, more meetings. But as Juliet Funt, founder of the Juliet Funt Group, teaches in her Strategic Choice process, real leadership strength lies in deciding what to stop doing . Strategic Choice is the intentional narrowing of priorities—cutting away the clutter so teams can focus on what truly drives results. It’s a disciplined act of letting go: saying no to good ideas so there’s room for the great ones. Funt’s approach challenges leaders to pause, think, and create the mental and operational space their people need to perform at their best. By removing unnecessary tasks and misplaced effort, leaders make room for precision, innovation, and real thinking time. This isn’t about doing less—it’s about doing what matters most. When businesses adopt this mindset, they replace overwhelm with clarity and regain control of their time, energy, and outcomes. For small to mid-sized companies, embracing Strategic Choice can transform busyness into focus—and that focus is where sustainable growth begins. Want a quick visual overview? View Strategic Choice: Making Room for What Matters to see how this process helps leaders focus on what truly drives results.
By Cathie Leimbach November 4, 2025
Hey team leaders! Ever wonder why some companies soar while others stumble? Patrick Lencioni's bestseller, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team , nails it: workplace dysfunctions such as no trust, fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoiding accountability, and ignoring results lead to mediocre performance at best. But here's the good news—smart leadership development changes the game! Start with building trust . Train leaders to open up and be vulnerable. Teams bond, ideas flow, and costly mistakes drop. Next, embrace healthy conflict . Teach team leaders to make it safe for team members to share the pros and cons of current or new ways of doing things. This helps everyone understand different perspectives. Then, drive commitment . Leaders who clarify goals, ask everyone to share their level of buy-in, and address their concerns get everyone bought in. People focus on high value work and get more done. . Hold folks accountable through coaching. Leaders learn to give kind, direct feedback by praising good work and calmly providing more training as needed. Turnover plummets and the quality and quantity of work improves. Finally, focus on results . Be clear on expectations. Keep score by monitoring progress weekly or daily. Acknowledge team wins when the goals are met. Winning sports teams pay attention to these Five Behaviors of a Team. How would a World Series winner have been determined this week without trust among the players and coaches, openness to tough coaching, the whole team working together, players focusing on their specific positions, and getting players around the bases to get the top score? Every workplace can benefit from these team behaviors as well. Lencioni's research proves it: Companies who prepare their leaders to overcome these 5 common workplace dysfunctions, improve the culture and see huge financial gains. Invest in your leaders today. Your bottom line will thank you! Click here to learn more about the painful cost of team dysfunction.